Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Funding Formula topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
State board adopts new technology-center funding formula
Summary
The State Board approved a revised funding formula intended to allocate state dollars more equitably across technology center districts; board members voted unanimously after staff outlined the mechanics and transition protections.
The Oklahoma CareerTech State Board on a unanimous vote approved a revised Technology Center Funding Formula intended to distribute state funding more equitably among the system’s 29 technology center districts.
Board members voted to accept the formula after staff walked the board through the formula’s four parts — local needs (based on ad valorem collections), a secondary service incentive tied to share of eligible 11th–12th grade students served, approved campus funding required by statute, and a student-service formula measuring instructional spending. “We’re revising this because the old formula did not provide equity to the system,” a staff presenter told the board during the presentation.
Why it matters: The board said the new mechanism aims to move funding toward districts that serve more students or have greater program needs while protecting districts from an abrupt loss of state funds during the transition. Staff emphasized the formula would be audited twice a year and adjusted for changes in local collections or program counts.
How it works: About 70% of state funds under the proposal are allocated to local program needs, which considers districts’ local revenue estimates and the number and length (FTE weighting) of their approved programs. A 10% portion is set aside as an incentive for districts that serve a higher share of eligible 11th–12th graders; the remaining portions cover approved campus funding and student-service incentives tied to instructional spending, counseling, support, and transportation.
Transition protections and thresholds: Presenters said the roll-out is structured so no district would lose money initially. Districts must have programs that meet a minimum fill threshold (60% of a program’s seats) to be eligible for formula funding. Staff said they will audit program counts and local revenue figures at least twice a year and adjust allocations accordingly.
Board discussion and vote: The formula was discussed at length earlier in the meeting, including a review of sample district calculations and the impact of available state dollars at different appropriation levels. After a motion and second, the board voted “yes” (recorded votes: Michael Brown; Peter Dillingham; Randy Gilbert; Jalen Hanning; Leonard McCullough). The chair announced the motion passed.
What’s next: Staff said they will finalize the mechanics, publish the detailed allocation amounts for districts, and proceed with the audit schedule. The board retained authority to consider appeals from districts about their calculated amounts.
