Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Drainage Annexation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Kossuth County board accepts voluntary annexation into Drainage District 133

5066269 · June 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After a public hearing, the board voted to accept a consultant'9s report and a voluntary annexation and classification schedule adding multiple parcels to Drainage District 133.

Kossuth County supervisors voted Thursday to accept a consultant's report and approve a voluntary annexation into Drainage District 133, following a public hearing with the landowners and the district engineer on the phone.

The board accepted the annexation and the report, which included a classification schedule for newly added acreage, by voice vote after a motion from Supervisor Kyle Stecker and a second by Supervisor Matt Wachter. The motion carried.

The annexation request, presented by consultant Jim Clarkson and county engineer Kyle (first name used in the meeting), would add eight parcels not previously on D.D. 133's assessment schedule and increase acres draining into the district on four additional parcels. Colin (consultant) told the board the district can accept the additional drainage and recommended the annexation proceed; he also explained the newly annexed land needs a classification so it can be assessed in the future.

During public discussion, Supervisor Amber (first name used in the meeting) reported one landowner in Union Township, Section 5, had contacted her with concerns that flow changes could affect a large pasture along Kellems/Calamus Creek. Consultant Colin said he had not evaluated the downstream pasture specifically but that initial modeling suggested the net effect on water-surface elevation downstream would likely be negligible; he offered to investigate further if the landowner wanted a site-specific review.

Board members also discussed process questions: whether the annexation and classification required separate motions (the consultants and county attorney advised the board that state law permits conducting the annexation and classification together) and the practical effect on future assessments if the newly annexed land later was reclassified. After the hearing the board closed the public comment period, then moved and approved the report and annexation that includes the classification schedule.

The action authorizes county staff to complete the administrative entries needed to add the parcels to D.D. 133's assessment schedule; the board did not adopt any immediate new assessments as part of the vote.

Votes and next steps will be reflected in the district's assessment lists; the board directed staff to accept follow-up questions from landowners and to circulate final paperwork for the annexation.