Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Guardrails Contract topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Wayne County approves multi-year guardrail contract after commissioners question rising replacement costs

3672621 · May 21, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee approved a three-year purchase order with two one-year renewal options for guardrail beams and parts; staff described price increases and more frequent collisions as drivers of higher costs and discussed site safety and possible countermeasures.

Wayne County commissioners approved a three-year purchase order with two one-year renewal options for guardrail beams, parts and accessories for the Department of Public Services, Road Division.

Steve Shea, division director for Wayne County Roads, told commissioners that material prices have risen and that the county is replacing guardrails more often because of a higher number of collisions. "I've replaced that twice already at $16,000 a pop," Shea said, referring to a location on Outer Drive near M-10 where repeated damage required replacement. He and other staff also noted that changes in Michigan Department of Transportation specifications for guardrail endpoints and rails have contributed to higher replacement costs.

Commissioners asked several operational questions about safety measures and whether other countermeasures were available. Commissioner Badoon asked whether guardrails are steel; Shea confirmed they are, and explained there are impact attenuators and other devices but that the typical roadside guardrails are steel beams on posts. Commissioner Al Wilson asked about signage and cameras in problem areas; Shea said signs had repeatedly been knocked down at a cited location and that staff used studies to determine where guardrails would reduce liability and improve safety. The county said cameras and other measures had been discussed but not implemented for these locations.

The purchase order was included in a bundled motion covering items 1–9; the motion carried. The transcript records staff describing the replacement frequency, cost pressures, and the county's approach to prioritizing installations based on site risk.

The county did not provide a per-year dollar total in the meeting record; commissioners were told the contract will supply guardrail material on an as-needed basis.