Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Property Taxation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Assessor warns of heavy workload during valuation-system conversion and asks for limited reclassifications

3639474 · May 30, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The county assessor presented a $6.86 million budget tied to a multi-phase conversion to a new property-valuation and tax system and requested reclassifications to support the transition.

Benton Countys assessor updated the Budget Committee on a proposed 25-27 assessment budget (about $6.86 million current-service-level) and outlined a multi-part conversion to a new property valuation and tax system that county staff said will be implemented in two phases beginning July 2025.

Why it matters: The assessors office values property, maintains tax maps, processes exemptions and coordinates tax-rate/billing functions that fund most county taxing districts. An extended conversion while maintaining legacy systems affects staff workload and could raise short-term maintenance costs.

Key points - Conversion and dual-system costs: The assessor said the county is converting from two legacy systems into a new combined system (OrCats is the vendor referenced); work begins July 1, 2025 on the tax/accounting piece and valuation conversion starts January 1, 2026. The assessor said the biennium includes overlapping maintenance payments because older systems remain live during conversion; she estimated roughly $250,000 in legacy-system maintenance plus new-system costs during the transition. - Staffing and succession: The assessor highlighted vacancies and near-term retirements. She said a limited-duration program coordinator was hired internally during the last biennium and that reclassifications and a permanent program coordinator position would help manage conversion projects, data-audit work and omission identification (the assessor cited a recent discovery of an omitted parcel that generated roughly $250,000 of added value). The assessor requested several reclassifications; county staff recommended two of the six requested reclasses in reduced form. - Appraisal and field work: The department reported it values roughly 40,521 real and personal property accounts and that omitted-value discovery in a recent year added about $320,000 to taxes; the assessor said roughly 1,300 properties had not been inspected in 25+ years and that appraisal capacity is needed to address long-standing omissions.

Committee questions and staff notes Committee members asked whether assessment data uploads and scanned property jackets would be made publicly available; the assessor said both scanned jackets and tax-card records are intended to be published on the new property-search platform as part of the conversion. Staff noted the departments workload is substantial and that implementing the conversion while maintaining customer service will be the main near-term challenge.

Ending: The assessor urged the committee to consider the conversion workload and the need for cross-training/reclassification to preserve institutional knowledge; staff proposed limited freezes and recommended two reclassifications to help manage conversion and sustain appraisal capacity. No formal votes were recorded during the presentation.