Get email alerts on the Design Standards topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves standards for single-family "in common" developments and setbacks
Summary
Conway planning commissioners approved amendments to Article 6 to add design standards for single-family developments built "in common," including a 25-foot exterior perimeter setback and 15-foot separation between structures; parking standards follow Article 8 apartment rules.
Get email alerts on the Design Standards topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
On June 5 the Conway Planning Commission approved text amendments to Article 6 of the Unified Development Ordinance establishing standards for single-family developments built "in common" (multiple detached single-family units on one parcel). The amendments add minimum separation and setback rules and identify where the use is permitted.
Staff said in-common single-family developments have drawn developer interest but there were previously no UDO standards specific to detached single-family structures built in common; townhomes already have standards. The approved amendment requires a 25-foot building setback from exterior project boundaries for in-common developments in applicable residential districts and a minimum 15-foot separation between detached structures within a site. The amendment also clarifies that the units may be subdivided as fee-simple lots or remain in common, and that parking standards will match apartment-parking rules in Article 8.
Commissioners discussed examples, fire/development separation guidance (15 feet), and how the perimeter setback applies to the project boundary rather than each individual house. The motion to approve the Article 6 changes carried.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

