Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the General Plan Historic Overlay topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
River Heights commission discusses adding historic‑overlay language to general plan, debates 200 East road language
Summary
Commissioners reviewed proposed language to add a historic‑landmark overlay to the general plan and debated whether to show or oppose a proposed 200 East road extension on the transportation map; no formal vote was taken.
River Heights Planning and Zoning Commission members on May 13 reviewed proposed additions to the city’s general plan to recognize historic overlay zones and debated language about a proposed “200 East” transportation alternative.
Rayne Kagan, a planning commission member, proposed adding language to the general plan to “support the revitalization and productive reuse of structures at least 50 years old” by creating historical‑landmark overlay zones. Kagan said the suggested wording largely mirrors existing land‑use provisions already in the municipal code and was intended to give readers of the general plan a concise statement of purpose for overlay zones rather than replicate procedural code language.
Commissioners also discussed a transportation paragraph that would state River Heights should oppose a regional “200 East” extension but plan for it if it is adopted by the regional planning body. Several commissioners said the road would not benefit most River Heights residents and could impose environmental, traffic and ambiance impacts. One commissioner noted that John Jenkins is preparing a letter to the engineers opposing the alignment; commissioners agreed that the city council ultimately must decide whether the road appears on the general‑plan transportation map.
Planning staff said they are waiting for the full transportation study and data from the engineering analysis before making final map changes. Commissioners generally supported drafting the historic‑overlay language and agreed to send proposed revisions to the city council for feedback rather than advance final changes before the council acts on the transportation study.
No formal vote was recorded on the historic‑overlay insertion or the 200 East language during the meeting. Commissioners said they would circulate a draft to council members and return with revised text after staff incorporates comments and the pending transportation study is complete.
