Bioethicist testifies Michigan’s 24‑hour wait, coercion screen and disclosures are consistent with informed consent
Duke bioethicist Dr. Farr Curlin testified that Michigan's statutorily required 24‑hour waiting period, coercion screening, and MDHHS disclosure materials align with established norms of informed consent and do not appear stigmatizing in the materials he reviewed.
The full story
Dr. Farr Curlin, a Duke University physician and bioethicist called as an expert by defendants, testified the Michigan statutes requiring a 24‑hour waiting period, coercion screening and statutorily prescribed disclosure materials are compatible with accepted norms of informed consent.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
or
Free account
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in