Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Meeting Votes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Votes at a glance: EUC approves routine items; 2 contested rate-design measures fail

5558916 · August 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Electric Utility Commission approved consent and routine items, and separately approved individual contracts for UPlan extension and an EMV&R contractor. A separate commission motion on rate-design for the FY2025–26 budget failed 3–7.

The Electric Utility Commission on July 15 approved a package of consent and routine items and recorded separate votes on three substantive agenda items. Key outcomes:

- Items 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13: Approved as a block by voice vote. A commissioner moved approval and other commissioners seconded; the chair called the ayes, and the motion carried with no dissent recorded.

- Item 4 (UPlan contract amendment): Approved unanimously. Motion carried; staff will issue an RFP in August 2025 and use the contract extension as an interim bridge to a competitive procurement.

- Item 5 (Evaluation, measurement, verification and reporting contract): Approved unanimously to hire a third party to evaluate program impacts and to help Austin Energy add greenhouse-gas reductions to program metrics starting in 2027.

- Item 14 (FY2025–26 budget recommendation to City Council on rate design): Motion to recommend City Council secure the same revenue increase through volumetric rates rather than raising the monthly customer charge failed by a roll-call vote (3 in favor, 7 opposed). The commission did not adopt an alternative recommendation on rate design.

The approvals for items 2, 3 and 6–13 were taken together after commissioners identified items 4, 5 and 14 for separate discussion. The meeting record shows the votes for the block approval were taken by voice; no individual nay votes were recorded in the transcript for the consent block.