Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Setback Accessory Structures topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents ask city to consider exception for accessory structures set far from road
Summary
Residents described a property with an accessory building set roughly 300 feet behind the road and asked Planning and Zoning to consider code language that would allow certain outbuildings before the primary dwelling under strict conditions.
Residents at the meeting asked Planning and Zoning staff to consider an exception or clarified standard for accessory structures on lots where the primary dwelling is set a long distance from the road.
A resident identified as a member of the Hansen family described a property with roughly 300 feet between the road and the house and asked whether the city could allow an accessory building — for example, a detached garage — closer to the road on a private drive. “Were just wondering if there is any perhaps lenience for or consideration of maybe adding some language where there is so much of an offset with the private driveway to be able to have, like, an addition or accessory, unit, not dwelling unit, but a garage that we would build separately,” the resident said.
Planning staff and other members explained the current path for exceptions: the Planning and Zoning Commission must follow code; variances and adjustments are handled by the Board of Adjustments under strict criteria. Staff described past cases where applicants were denied variances and where neighbors have chosen to move because they could not afford to comply with the code.
Staff recommended the resident write a formal proposal for Planning and Zoning to review and suggested routing it to Holly and Abby in the planning office for initial review and then to the commission. “Why dont you write up a proposal and submit it to Holly and just put attention planning and zoning. Okay. And then she can get it to Abby who is our planning and zoning secretary, and well look at it,” a staff member said.
Commission discussion noted factors that would be considered in evaluating a proposed change: septic location, lot history (whether the parcel predates the existing code), and how the change would affect neighboring properties. Staff said a site visit and review of overhead imagery would likely be part of the evaluation before any recommendation to city council.
Ending: Residents were encouraged to submit a written proposal; staff will review details including septic placement and property history and may take the recommendation to Planning and Zoning and then to city council if appropriate.
