Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Boundary Line Adjustment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission debuts plan for a simple boundary‑line‑adjustment application, clarifies zoning‑clearance recordkeeping
Summary
Clarkston commissioners discussed drafting a streamlined application for boundary‑line adjustments and agreed to require a minimal application with before/after diagrams, fees and retained records; they declined to impose a blanket requirement for surveys but said they could request surveys in specific cases.
The Clarkston Town Planning and Zoning Commission discussed drafting a standardized application and simple map requirement for boundary‑line adjustments at its April 2025 meeting, with the aim of creating a paper trail for future disputes while keeping the process inexpensive for residents.
Planning staff proposed an application that would include two schematic boxes: a “before” and an “after” drawing showing property dimensions and the proposed adjustment, plus a statement of any measurements used. Commissioners suggested the form include brief instructions to make clear what level of detail is needed. The commission agreed the form should remain low‑barrier for routine adjustments (for example, small transfers to allow an accessory shed) and that it should not require a certified boundary survey in every case. Commissioners said they could require a survey when buildings, tight setbacks or potential disputes make higher accuracy necessary.
Staff said there is already a fee for boundary‑line adjustments and that submitted applications and zoning‑clearance materials will be kept permanently in the town files to provide evidence if a later property‑line dispute arises. Commissioners discussed enforcement limits in a small town — most recordkeeping will support third‑party dispute resolution or county actions rather than proactive municipal audits — and agreed to consult comparable towns for samples before finalizing language.
The commission also briefly reviewed a pending zoning/building permit for an accessory structure filed by Michelle Lerinshaw and noted that the submitted packet lacked setback measurements; staff asked commissioners to make comments in the town’s CityInspect system and to request a clearer plot plan before final permit approval.
Ending: Staff will draft a boundary‑line‑adjustment form with before/after diagrams and instructions, keep submitted applications permanently in town records, and consult other towns about common practices; surveys will be required only in specific, high‑risk cases.
