Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Spaces Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Wright County supervisors discuss courthouse grounds use policy, request CDA review before final approval

2578052 · March 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Supervisors reviewed a proposed courthouse grounds use policy (resolution 2025-13) that would set rules, liability terms and an application process for use of the courthouse grounds and shared electrical outlets. The board agreed to seek review from the CDA before scheduling a final vote.

The Wright County Board of Supervisors discussed resolution 2025-13, a proposed policy establishing rules and a permit process for use of the Wright County courthouse grounds, and agreed to seek review from the CDA before taking final action.

The policy, presented to the board following review by the county safety committee and county attorney, defines permitted uses of the grounds, contains a liability and hold-harmless clause, and establishes an application and approval process. The proposed permit requires applicants who want to use the courthouse’s electrical outlets to obtain CDA approval because those outlets are on a separate metering system under joint ownership. The policy also requires applicants to accept responsibility for safe use of outlets, including covering cords.

Supervisors expressed general support for having a formal policy after increased informal use of the grounds, and several members said the county’s insurance carrier recommended adopting written rules. Multiple supervisors asked that the CDA review the portion of the policy that governs the CDA-owned electrical outlets before the board places the resolution on a future agenda. The board agreed to table the resolution until that review is complete.

No final vote on resolution 2025-13 was taken during the meeting; the board requested staff obtain CDA input and return the item for formal consideration at a later date.