Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Emergency Evacuation Access topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Resident raises evacuation and access concerns for west-side Bend during public comment

2626752 · February 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

During public comment at the Jan. 24 Bend MPO meeting a resident urged officials to consider evacuation routes and emergency access for the city’s west side, noting perceived imbalances in fire-station location, limited road crossings and growing development.

A member of the public used the Bend MPO’s Jan. 24 public-comment period to raise concerns about evacuation capacity and emergency access on Bend’s west side. The speaker — not identified by name in the transcript — said the city’s current road and emergency-service configuration concentrates emergency stations and major access routes on the east side and warned that in a major disaster residents on parts of the west side could face constrained egress.

Among the points the resident raised: “There’s 60,000 people on the West Side of the river. There's 60,000 on the East side of the river in Bend,” and, the speaker said, “There’s 6 Bridal crossings and there's not 1 Fort Lane Road on the West Side,” characterizing limited crossing and roadway options as a risk for evacuation. The commenter also referenced recent regional disasters as examples of large population movements and urged attention to “a way out” as growth continues.

A city representative acknowledged the concern and said emergency- and disaster-preparedness planning and reexamination of plans are active topics at the city-council level; the staff speaker offered to connect the commenter with more resources by email.

Why it matters: emergency access and evacuation capacity are transportation and public-safety issues; the comment linked infrastructure planning to disaster resilience and local growth patterns.

Background and next steps: the comment was entered during the MPO’s public comment period; staff offered to follow up and provide additional resources on preparedness and planning to the commenter.