Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Traffic Safety Iid topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee extends ignition interlock pilot: AB 71 to keep IID program through 2033
Summary
AB 71 would extend the state ignition interlock device (IID) pilot from its 2026 sunset to 2033; the committee passed the measure to Appropriations after proponents said the devices prevent DUI attempts and help people enter treatment, while opponents raised cost and evidence questions.
Assemblymember Lackey presented AB 71 to extend the ignition interlock device (IID) pilot program through 2033. Lackey said IIDs—breath-interlock devices installed on vehicles—prevent impaired drivers from starting their cars and cited program statistics: “In 2023 alone, over 30,500 drunk driving attempts were prevented using these devices in this state.” He warned that without extension California would be the only state without an IID program.
Supporters included treatment and recovery advocates, DUI counselors, the California District Attorneys Association, sheriffs and police associations, and IID proponents. Speakers said IIDs save lives, deter repeat drunk driving, and can prompt individuals to recognize substance-use problems and seek treatment. Sherry Daley of the California Consortium of Addiction Programs and Professionals argued the device provides objective feedback that can move people toward recovery.
Opposition and concerns were raised by a handful of groups, including Ella Baker Center for Human Rights, Legal Services for Prisoners with Children, and advocates who questioned the cost burden on low-income individuals and pointed to inconsistent studies about program effectiveness. The author accepted committee amendments and emphasized IID orders remain discretionary for courts and are intended as a public‑safety and treatment tool rather than an automatic penalty.
The committee voted to pass AB 71, as amended, to Appropriations. The chair noted the value of leaving tools and court discretion in place and recommended an aye vote. Supporters and opponents signaled continued engagement on cost and access issues as the bill moves forward.
