Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Homelessness Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County update: coordinated‑entry bottlenecks, homeless encampment reporting and Loop patrols
Summary
County staff told the Board of Supervisors that recent coordinated‑entry data show large gaps between people who complete homeless housing assessments and those who are ultimately placed into HUD‑funded housing programs, and supervisors also extended a pilot ‘Loop’ patrol used to address criminal activity and encampments along the trail.
Get email alerts on the Homelessness Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Pima County staff briefed supervisors on recent homelessness system metrics and on a pilot safety patrol on the Loop that seeks to reduce criminal activity and improve public safety for park and trail users.
During the meeting, staff summarized a recent gaps analysis of the coordinated‑entry system: 7,689 individuals or households completed a housing assessment; 1,069 (about 13%) met the continuum‑of‑care’s community prioritization; and 535 (roughly 6% of completed assessments) received housing program placements. County staff and community advocates said the data highlight a bottleneck between assessments and actual placements and pointed to several contributing causes: program eligibility mismatch, individuals who cannot be located when a referral is made, household choice and program‑level restrictions tied to funding rules.
“Those are gonna have to be a conversation,” county staff said when describing why internationally referred households were not ultimately housed; staff urged coordinated, system‑level improvements by the local continuum of care (the Tucson Pima Collaboration to End Homelessness) to reduce attrition between assessment and placement.
Separately, the county’s pilot “Loop Patrol” – private patrol staff funded by the county to cover trail and park areas after dark – submitted a six‑month field report. The patrol recorded thousands of contacts and identified six sites responsible for roughly two‑thirds of reported problems along the multi‑use trail and adjacent parks. Patrol staff reported compliance with voluntary removal requests most of the time, but also a persistent subset of contacts who remained in place and engaged in criminal activity. County officials extended the pilot through the end of the fiscal year and will meet with Tucson Police and other public safety partners to increase targeted presence and refine outreach and enforcement coordination.
Quote: County staff summarized the coordinated‑entry findings in stark terms: “What would have happened to the remaining 534, referred individuals?” the presentation asked, underscoring the system’s attrition between assessment and placement.
Ending: County staff told the board they will continue to pursue better data sharing and coordinated case‑conferencing with the continuum of care and city partners; board members asked for follow‑up materials showing how the county and city plan to close the gap between assessments and housing placements.

