Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City staff reports noise and lighting ordinances are functioning; no immediate code changes recommended
Summary
After roughly 17 months under the updated noise and lighting ordinances, staff reported complaint volumes and enforcement outcomes and recommended no substantive changes; council discussed enforcement practices, measurement equipment and handling of grandfathered lighting.
City staff reported to council on a year‑plus review of ordinances adopted in 2023 addressing noise (Chapter 22, Sec. 22‑4) and outdoor lighting (Chapter 22, Sec. 22‑30). The review compared complaint counts and enforcement activity for the 17 months before and after adoption and described enforcement mechanisms for lighting and noise issues.
Development Services and the Police Department provided the data. The police department reported 192 noise complaints in the 17 months leading up to adoption (with eight charges) and 237 complaints in the subsequent 17 months (with one charge), data the police chief provided to staff. Development Services reported seven lighting complaints since ordinance adoption; four involved lighting put in place before the ordinance (and thus potentially grandfathered) and three required follow‑up and correction work by property owners, with one matter still under resolution.
Staff said lighting enforcement is handled primarily by Development Services because site‑specific installations require ongoing remediation, while noise enforcement is generally handled by police. Councilmembers asked about measurement equipment and protocol: the chief said supervisors carry sound meters and typically respond to noise calls; officers often resolve quality‑of‑life complaints by advising the involved parties rather than immediately issuing citations. Several councilmembers and staff described recent successful remediation of specific lighting cases (for example, a church lighting issue) and noted that many preexisting lights are legally nonconforming and difficult to require to be removed outright, though staff will attempt informal resolution when possible.
Ending: Staff recommended no immediate changes to the noise or lighting ordinances but advised council to continue monitoring and to report specific recurring problem locations for focused enforcement or ordinance refinement if necessary.
