Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Capital Equipment Procurement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Bannock County weighs tractor replacement after weekend breakdown; budget options discussed

5130894 · July 3, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

County staff reported a county tractor suffered alternator failure and an oil leak that could damage the turbo; officials discussed rental scarcity, staffing constraints and possible purchase options using event funds, contingency or PILT money, and asked staff to return with quotes on Tuesday.

Bannock County staff told commissioners on July 3 that a primary tractor used for grounds and event work suffered an alternator failure and a turbo oil leak ahead of a holiday weekend, creating an urgent equipment gap.

The staff member said an alternator was ordered but expressed concern that if oil is being ingested into the turbo, running the tractor could cause major damage. Attempts to secure a like-sized rental were unsuccessful because of high seasonal demand.

Officials discussed buying a used replacement rather than renting. Staff recommended a 115-horsepower tractor as the appropriate size; they estimated a used 115-horsepower machine could cost $80,000–$100,000, while a new 145-horsepower tractor could approach $250,000. The county noted $250,000 had been budgeted for Bannock County events this year, of which about $63,000 is already obligated; commissioners suggested using that line, general-fund contingency or PILT receipts as funding sources if a purchase is approved.

The board emphasized the need for Road and Bridge mechanics to inspect any used machine before purchase and suggested negotiating a trial period so mechanics could certify the equipment. Commissioners also recommended buying a machine sized to last a decade rather than a near-term stopgap.

No formal purchase vote occurred. Staff were directed to return with firm prices and procurement options at the next board meeting.