Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Strategy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bexley land use strategy highlights green space, asks Tree Commission for input
Summary
City staff presented a two-year Land Use Strategy to the Bexley Tree Commission, emphasizing green space, commercial corridor design and partnerships; commissioners were asked to review the 70-page draft before upcoming council consideration.
City staff member Megan presented the draft Bexley Land Use Strategy to the Bexley Tree Commission and asked commissioners to review the document and provide feedback ahead of an upcoming City Council consideration.
Megan said the strategy is “over 2 years in the making,” and described it as a high-level policy document intended to guide where development should occur and how limited land resources can be used for the city’s “highest and best use.” She said the document was introduced at City Council three meetings ago but had not been voted on; council asked that the plan be seen by boards and commissions before further action.
Commissioners were told the plan resulted from multiple public workshops, two rounds of public surveying and a market analysis conducted with a local development firm. The strategy organizes recommendations by commercial corridors — East Main Street, West Main Street, North Cass City and Livingston Avenue — and incorporates previously adopted elements such as the Southwest Bexley framework and the recent Livingston Avenue engagement.
Megan told the commission residents repeatedly asked for more green space, and she said the strategy contains pocket-park recommendations along Main Street and other measures intended to energize street corridors and increase foot traffic for restaurants and retail. She also described the city’s reliance on partnerships — with the schools, Capital University, developers, the Community Improvement Corporation (CIC) and businesses — to implement recommendations in a dense, 2.5-square-mile community.
Commission members were asked specifically to read the residential sections and consider where the Tree Commission’s objectives align with the strategy and commercial design guidelines; Megan offered to receive questions or suggestions and said staff will consider whether items belong in the commercial design guidelines, the land use strategy, or implementation steps.
The commission did not take a formal vote on the strategy at the meeting; members discussed timing and were encouraged to submit comments before council’s next meeting.
