Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Pennington County Planning Commission, Oct. 27, 2025
Summary
Summary of final actions taken by the Pennington County Planning Commission on Oct. 27, 2025: approvals include two conditional-use permits for Yarrow Tech (items 6 and 7), a PUD amendment for JV Gulch (item 14) with modifications, a road name change (item 13), and a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone (items 15 and 16).
Get email alerts on the Meeting Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Pennington County Planning Commission recorded the following formal actions on Oct. 27, 2025 (recommendations go to the Board of County Commissioners where applicable):
- COCUR24-0022 (Item 6): Conditional-use permit review for Yarrow Tech (utility-scale solar). Approved by the commission with staff-recommended conditions (28 conditions precedent). The planning commission noted the permit will return for renewal in one year.
- COCUR24-0023 (Item 7): Conditional-use permit review for Yarrow Tech (utility-scale wind). Approved by the commission with staff-recommended conditions (25 conditions). The commission noted the permit will return for renewal in one year.
- PUR94-20 (Item 14): Planned-unit-development amendment for JV Gulch LLC. Approved with two modifications: removal of an historic condition (condition #2) and revised language to allow accessory structures/garages under building-permit control (condition #5 revised).
- Item 13: Proposed road name change for a private road (applicant DJ Perkins, four property owners signed). Approved per staff recommendation.
- COCA25-0009 (Item 15): Comprehensive plan amendment (Shane Schreiner) to change future land use designations to commercial. Planning commission recommended approval.
- CORZ25-0010 (Item 16): Rezoning request (Shane Schreiner) from agricultural/suburban/highway service districts to commercial for 1.3 acres. Planning commission recommended approval.
Votes were typically carried by voice or roll call depending on remote attendance; several items had brief or no public comment and were approved as presented by staff.

