Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Mixed Use Parking topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Tulsa board allows bank drive‑through under mixed‑use plan and waives liner‑building requirement for parking deck

City of Tulsa Board of Adjustment · October 28, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Board of Adjustment approved a special exception for a bank drive‑through under a proposed mixed‑use redevelopment at NE corner of E. 30th St. S and Peoria Ave and a variance to waive the 'liner building' requirement for a Ground‑Floor parking deck; the board cited the parcel’s three‑street configuration and parking constraints.

The Tulsa Board of Adjustment on Oct. 28 approved two zoning reliefs for a mixed‑use redevelopment at the northeast corner of East 30th Street South and Peoria Avenue: a special exception allowing a bank drive‑through and a variance removing the code requirement that a parking deck’s Ground Floor be screened by occupiable 'liner' buildings facing sidewalks.

Applicant Nathan Cross told the board the redevelopment follows a prior, more ambitious rezoning and that the current plan responds to market conditions while aiming to add public parking after hours. The project includes a one‑level parking deck with a limited amount of retail or restaurant space along Peoria; the bank wants a drive‑through window beneath the structure.

The city’s 'liner‑building' requirement normally requires occupiable uses — retail or offices — at street level to mask parking levels and keep a pedestrian‑oriented frontage. The applicant proposed an alternate strategy using mature canopy trees and high‑quality landscaping to screen the Ground Floor where the parking deck faces side streets and a detention area at the northwest corner.

Board members said they understood the code’s pedestrian‑oriented goal but also noted the site’s unusual shape and the need to preserve parking counts. One board member summarized the finding for the variance by pointing to the lot’s three street frontages and how a strict liner would substantially reduce available parking. The board approved both requests, finding the lot configuration and public parking objectives established a basis for relief.

Next steps: Final design and permit applications will be subject to engineering and pedestrian‑safety review. Any retail or restaurant space proposed for the Ground Floor will be reviewed under normal building‑permit and public‑safety standards.