Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Governance Meeting Procedure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commissioner asks for clearer notices, records and procedural consistency at Wasilla planning meetings

Wasilla Planning Commission · October 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commissioner Lanshill read a prepared statement at the Oct. 14 meeting requesting restoration of previously provided departmental reports, written mayoral cancellation notices, scheduled ethics training and clarified reconsideration procedures under Robert's Rules as applied to the planning commission.

Commissioner Lanshill used the commission-comments portion of the Oct. 14 meeting to deliver a prepared, on-the-record statement asking the Planning Commission and city staff to restore and clarify a range of procedural practices.

Lanshill said commissioners had previously received detailed reports from Parks and Recreation, Public Works, Code Compliance and planning staff through April 2021 and asked why those reports had dropped away. He asked staff to explain what prompted the change and requested restoration of timely departmental reports to help the commission fulfill its responsibilities.

He asked for written mayoral notification when meetings are canceled, citing Wasilla Municipal Code language that gives the mayor authority to cancel meetings and requiring such cancellations to be documented. He raised concerns about the commission’s use of its official seal (WMC 2.60.030 and related sections) and requested the seal be used on official correspondence as required by code.

On parliamentary procedure, Lanshill said the city attorney’s office had advised the commission that Wasilla code is silent on reconsiderations and observed that Robert's Rules of Order (which the municipal code references) permits a member of the prevailing side to move to reconsider a motion in the same meeting or the next day; Lanshill asked for confirmed guidance and suggested the commission could adopt a local resolution if further clarity was needed.

He also requested that the city provide the ethics training the municipal code requires, with signed acknowledgments, and to schedule it "ASAP." Lanshill said he had provided staff copies of email attachments for three items to be scheduled on upcoming agendas and reserved further comment until those items appear on future agendas.

During the meeting the consent agenda (including Sept. 9, 2025 minutes) was approved on a motion by Commissioner Stafford and a second by Commissioner Lanchill. Chair Seals announced the motion was approved; no roll-call opposition was recorded on the transcript.

Lanshill concluded by urging the commission to restore transparent, law‑compliant practices to better serve a rapidly growing municipality and to provide residents, businesses and developers with predictable processes.