Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Legal Litigation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

National City council meets in closed session to discuss three litigation matters

City of National City Council · January 21, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The City of National City council convened a meeting, heard no public comment and entered a closed session to discuss two named lawsuits—Humana v. City of National City and Cummins v. City of National City—and one anticipated litigation matter, the city attorney said. The council reconvened and said it would report out at the end of the meeting.

The City of National City council convened a regularly scheduled meeting and moved into closed session to discuss three litigation matters, the city attorney said.

According to the city attorney, two of the items are existing lawsuits: “Humana versus City of National City” and “Cummins versus City of National City.” The attorney added there was a final item listed as anticipated litigation involving one case. The council then entered closed session.

Before the closed session, the council established a quorum, the clerk outlined public-comment procedures and the clerk reported there were no public comments on agenda items. After the closed session the council reconvened and said it would report out at the end of the meeting.

No public votes, ordinances or motions were recorded in the transcript of the open meeting. The transcript shows the council’s only publicly stated action was to convene the closed session to discuss the named litigation and the anticipated case. The city attorney and the council did not disclose details of the cases in the public record presented in the transcript.

The meeting was called to order, the Pledge of Allegiance was recited and the meeting was adjourned after reconvening; the clerk had said written public comments received by the published deadline would be distributed to council and posted on the city website.