Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Compensation Study topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

City staff present compensation and classification study recommending a single salary schedule

Ashland City Council · May 20, 2025

Summary

McGrath Human Resources Group reported findings that a majority of Ashland positions are below market and recommended an integrated single salary schedule with eight steps, step 4 as market midpoint, and annual CPI adjustments with market studies every three to five years.

Human Resources Director Molly Taylor introduced the city’s compensation and classification study at the May 20 meeting. Victoria McGrath, CEO of McGrath Human Resources Group, presented the methodology and findings, which included interviews with administration and department leaders, position questionnaires, and a market comparison with other public organizations.

Key findings reported in the presentation: 58% of positions are below market at the minimum salary level; 75% were below market at midpoint; 69% of positions do not have the same maximum earning capacity as comparator organizations; and 79% of incumbents were paid below market in the analysis presented. The consultant recommended a single integrated salary schedule to align positions internally and with the external market, an eight‑step progression with 3% between steps and Step 4 representing the average market rate. The presentation also recommended an annual review tied to a consistent economic indicator (for example CPI‑U) and a market analysis every three to five years.

Council did not take action to adopt the schedule at the May 20 meeting; the presentation was provided for council review and staff discussion.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source