Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Elections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Taunton council sends Elections Office report to executive session, schedules Oct. 28 review
Summary
The city solicitor recommended that a report by Elections Director Pacheco concerning conduct during the preliminary election be discussed in executive session; the council voted to hold that session on Oct. 28. The solicitor also advised the council on its authority to censure members and remedies when an elected member refuses to vote.
The Taunton Municipal Council voted on Oct. 21 to discuss an Elections Office report in executive session and set that meeting for Oct. 28, following legal advice from the city solicitor.
The city solicitor provided a written communication describing the Elections Director’s report about an incident that occurred during the preliminary election on Sept. 23, 2025. The solicitor recommended the council consider the report in executive session because it concerns the conduct of a public officer and the individual to be discussed has the right to 48 hours’ notice before that session.
The solicitor’s letter also explained council rules and disciplinary options. The office advised that the council may censure or reprimand a member, that such a motion requires a second, is open to amendment, is subject to debate and requires a majority vote under Robert’s Rules as incorporated into the council’s rules. The solicitor noted the council cannot remove an elected member but can amend rules to create other consequences (for example, committee privileges).
Council action: The council referred the matter to the Council of the Whole for discussion and voted to refer the specific incident to executive session, scheduling that session for Tuesday, Oct. 28. The law department will notify the person to be discussed as required by the Open Meeting Law.
What this means: The executive session will allow the council to receive the Elections Director’s report and discuss next steps in private under the Open Meeting Law’s exception for complaints or charges brought against a public officer. The council may later decide whether to move any portion of the matter into public session.
