Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Worcester County planning panel backs 7-foot garage clearance for required off-street parking in multifamily units

November 06, 2025 | Worcester County, Maryland


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Worcester County planning panel backs 7-foot garage clearance for required off-street parking in multifamily units
The Worcester County Planning Commission voted to recommend a text amendment to the county zoning code to require a minimum 7-foot clearance for required off-street parking spaces located inside garages for duplexes, townhouses and multifamily dwelling units, commissioners said at their November meeting.

The amendment, described to the commission by Miss Keener, would apply only where the required off-street parking is provided within an enclosed or covered structure; it would not apply to single-family homes where required parking is located outside the garage. "I have been requested to present an amendment to our code pertaining to the clearance height for off street parking, specifically within a garage or an enclosed or covered, space," Keener said.

Keener told the commission the proposal was prompted by a recently completed development where interior garage clearance measured less than 7 feet and "it's caused a lot of parking issues within the community." She said measuring from the garage frame to the slab or apron sometimes meets 7 feet but interior conditions — such as a slab lip, non-flush garage doors and overhead door openers — reduced usable clearance and prevented some vehicles from parking inside.

Commissioners clarified that the amendment addresses interior clearance for parking and does not change overall ceiling or building height. "This would just be your clearance height," Keener said, adding that the 7-foot minimum would not accommodate all larger vehicles but is intended to lessen the problem.

A commissioner moved to make a favorable recommendation on the amendment and the motion was seconded. The commission voted in favor with no opposition recorded. The meeting record does not specify the next procedural step or hearing date for the amendment.

Other items discussed briefly during the meeting included a noted appeal of case no. 2541 (a battery storage site on Seager Hall Road), a TRC review for Coastal Community Church, a proposed 137-unit Racetrack Village project, and a canvas shelter proposal; none of those items received extended discussion in the recorded transcript.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Maryland articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI