Proposal to codify rotation-by-district for mayoral posts fails to advance

Town Commission of the Town of Pembroke Park · November 8, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A motion to direct the town attorney to draft an ordinance implementing a rotation-by-district process for mayor and other leadership posts failed at the Nov. 20 meeting after extended debate over eligibility and whether such a system would bind future commissions.

Commissioners discussed an ordinance proposal to implement the charter's two-year rotation for mayor, vice mayor and clerk positions by commission district. The proposal—sponsored by Clerk Commissioner Hodgkins—would have codified a district-based rotation and included eligibility restrictions such as requiring a commissioner to have served a full term before being eligible to serve as mayor.

Supporters said a codified rotation would reduce ad hoc voting and provide predictability about who would hold leadership roles; opponents said it would bind future commissions, limit individual commissioners' discretion to choose leadership, and could result in inexperienced members serving as mayor if the rotation schedule landed on a newly elected commissioner. Town Attorney Trevor Horwitz explained that the charter requires the commission to make leadership selections every two years and that a range of models exist in other Florida municipalities but significant charter differences affect what is permissible without a voter referendum.

On a roll call vote to direct the town attorney to draft an implementing ordinance, Mayor Jacobs, Vice Mayor Kashem, Commissioner Mohammed and Acting Clerk Commissioner Morrissette voted No; Clerk Commissioner Hodgkins voted Yes. The motion failed.

Why it matters: The debate touches on local governance structure and whether the commission wants to insulate leadership choices from short-term political dynamics. Commissioners suggested the subject remains open for future workshops and that voter input could be sought if charter amendments are contemplated.