Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Warren County animal-control update: intakes fall, licensing push planned
Summary
Animal-control staff told commissioners the department handled just over 1,100 calls last year and brought in 531 dogs; staff plan a marketing push (62 signage locations, QR codes, school outreach) to raise licensing compliance and revenue that now covers much of operations.
Get email alerts on the Animal Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Nathan, the county’s animal-control supervisor, told the Warren County Board of Commissioners that the department handled just over 1,100 calls last year — about 250 after-hours — and brought in 531 dogs, down from roughly 1,200–1,300 a decade ago. "So our current numbers as far as calls go, last year we handled just over 1100 calls," Nathan said. He added that 183 of the animals taken in were claimed, about 35 percent, and the remainder were transferred to the humane association for adoption.
Nathan said dog-licensing fees are the department’s main revenue source and estimated licensing compliance is low: "we probably only have about 10% of the population" with a license displayed. He said licensing brings in about $450,000 a year and that the department will push marketing and convenience options this year, including signage with QR codes at 62 locations to point owners to online registration, continued over-the-counter sales through 24 agents, and school outreach to teach children about microchipping and the role of licensing in returning pets to owners.
Commissioners asked about enforcement and penalties when unlicensed dogs are located. Nathan said courts vary but fines are generally set by the local courts and typically run about $100–$150 for failure to license; officers prefer to give owners an opportunity to purchase a tag at the time of contact. He also said staff carry tags in vehicles to enable immediate licensing.
The update noted some inconsistencies and practical details in the discussion: staff described one-year and multi-year tag options, and mentioned a 10‑year “permanent” tag option; commissioners and staff discussed how counties sometimes supplement licensing revenue with lease arrangements and occasional general-fund support for the humane society lease. No formal action was taken on licensing; the item was presented as an informational update and staff outlined follow-up outreach and education plans.

