Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Adus topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Norfolk council adopts narrower ADU rules after residents raise safety and size concerns
Summary
Council approved changes to accessory dwelling unit (ADU) rules to simplify zoning regulations, prompting public praise for added housing options and warnings from neighbors about safety, parking and potential loss of conditional‑use oversight.
Get email alerts on the Zoning Adus topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Norfolk City Council adopted changes to the city zoning code on an ordinance to modify and simplify regulations for accessory dwelling units (ADUs), after a public hearing that drew residents both supportive and wary of the proposal.
The ordinance, introduced by the City Clerk as an amendment to Table 3.2.0.12 and section 4.3.0.3(e) of the Norfolk Zoning Ordinance, was adopted following a Planning Commission recommendation to approve the changes. Supporters at the hearing said relaxing ADU rules would expand housing supply, provide more affordable options and let residents age in place. “ADUs are important for the city,” Ginger Bates said, adding that the current 400‑square‑foot limit “is too small of a space for my house, and that’s too small of a space for me to fit, you know, my whole life in as a long term person.”
Opponents warned the change could remove safeguards provided by conditional use permits. Adrienne Creasy Starks, a Broad Creek homeowner, said that eliminating CUP review could allow conversions at nearby addresses—she cited 2924 Myrtle Avenue—and lead to increased transient traffic, parking congestion on narrow streets and declining property values. “If PH1 were to be approved, we, the neighbors, have no reason to think the property management would improve,” Starks said.
Council members framed the vote as balancing neighborhood protections with a need for more housing citywide. One councilor said they would vote yes while acknowledging the concerns raised by neighbors; the ordinance passed in the recorded council vote.
The ordinance modifies city zoning procedures and is intended to make ADU permitting more straightforward; the Planning Commission had recommended approval by a 6‑0 vote. The council recorded its adoption in a roll call during the meeting. The ordinance takes effect in accordance with the standard effective‑date language adopted by the council.
Next steps: the ordinance is adopted and enforcement/administration will be handled by city planning staff under the revised code language. Any remaining site‑specific issues that require enforcement or supplemental code interpretation will be addressed by the planning department as applications come in.

