Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Guide Accountability topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

NDOW outlines demerit system options to hold master guides accountable for subguide conduct

Elko County Advisory Board (CAB) · November 3, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

NDOW presented three proposals to address master-guide accountability: two would require statutory (NRS) changes; one could be implemented via NAC and would establish a clearer demerit system with defined suspension ranges and trespass/principal-to-a-crime tie-ins for hunting-related violations.

NDOW representative Jason Jackson presented proposed regulatory changes aimed at clarifying accountability for master guides when subguides commit hunting-related violations. He said the Commission requested language and that staff developed three options: two would require changes to Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) and are therefore legislative in scope, while a third could be implemented through the Nevada Administrative Code (NAC) at the Commission level.

Jackson described the NAC-option as a workable, commission-actionable approach that would add a more defined demerit table and attach specific suspension ranges to particular violations. He said the proposal would also include trespass provisions and language tying a master guide to a subguide’s actions under NRS 195 (principal to a crime) when the violation is wildlife or hunting related. "Basically, this cleans that up... it allows for the agency to be more fair... and more consistency," Jackson said.

CAB members asked whether master guides currently have recourse or accountability for subguide transgressions; Jackson replied that, unless a master guide accompanies the subguide during the violation, there is currently no fallback on the master guide and that the new language is intended to provide clarity and consistency.

Members agreed the idea of accountability had merit but urged that the "devil's in the details" and said they wanted to review proposed draft language when available. The item was informational; further materials and proposed NAC language will be presented at a future Commission meeting.