Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Setback Variance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves 20-foot setback variance for accessory building at 502 Dogwood Drive

Boyle County Board of Adjustments · October 22, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Boyle County Board of Adjustments unanimously approved a variance to reduce the front setback from 40 feet to 20 feet at 502 Dogwood Drive after the applicant described a sewer-line hardship and neighbors spoke in support.

The Boyle County Board of Adjustments unanimously approved a variance Oct. 21 allowing an accessory building to be placed closer to East Lexington Avenue at 502 Dogwood Drive.

Planning staff explained the parcel sits on a historic plat that imposes a 40-foot front setback on East Lexington Avenue and a 50-foot setback on Dogwood Drive. Staff noted that if the current zoning ordinance were applied the applicant would need a five-foot reduction or might not require a variance at all, and staff reported no concerns with the proposed minimal relief.

Applicant Christopher Young told the board the lot has limited usable backyard area because a sewer line runs through the rear and that drainage and erosion concern reduce buildable area. Young said he plans a board-on-board privacy fence along East Lexington Avenue and an ornamental black-steel fence elsewhere on the lot, and that he has already paid a deposit for the fence. He said he spoke with state officials about the frontage (East Lexington is a state road) and received guidance that a 15-foot buffer is acceptable.

Two nearby neighbors — Ty Staples (505 Woodland Place) and Greg Shalhoub (506) — spoke in support, telling the board Young has been a good neighbor and that the proposed improvements would be appropriate. No members of the public spoke in opposition.

A board member moved to approve the variance; the motion was seconded and carried without opposition. The applicant may proceed with the planned shed relocation and fence installation consistent with the approved setback.