Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Center Intellectual Freedom topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Regents committee discusses Center for Intellectual Freedom bylaws, membership and metrics ahead of board vote
Summary
The Governance, Evaluation & Human Resources Committee reviewed bylaws for the legislatively created Center for Intellectual Freedom, debated executive‑committee membership criteria (concern over current/former tenured R1 requirement and Iowa representation), and heard that the center has a $1 million state appropriation and will produce an annual report to the legislature.
Get email alerts on the Center Intellectual Freedom topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Executive Director Mark Braun presented draft bylaws for the Center for Intellectual Freedom, created under recent legislation. Braun said the bylaws are an initial operational framework and that additional policies will follow as the center stands up; he also noted the center has a $1 million state appropriation for startup activities and an inaugural event planned for December.
Regents raised questions about membership requirements. Several regents, including Regent Dunkel and Regent Hensley, expressed concern that provisions requiring a majority of advisory or executive committee members to be current or former tenured faculty at R1 institutions could exclude Iowan candidates and reduce local representation. Regent Dunkel proposed striking the line that would lock in a majority requirement; Braun and others said the executive committee has not been finalized and that Professor Luciano DeCastro has been involved in drafting bylaws and can assist in clarifying the membership plan.
Regents asked for more precise information on how many potential members would be excluded or included under the current language and requested that the universities provide counts (for example, how many potential candidates would qualify as current/former tenured R1 faculty) before the consent vote on the full board. The committee also discussed measures of success: Braun said the legislature requires an annual report and that the first annual reporting will be a key accountability mechanism. With questions raised, the committee planned to include clarifying information before forwarding the bylaws on the consent agenda.

