Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Personnel topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission strikes proposal for full‑time county events coordinator after cost and scope concerns

Utah County Board of Commissioners · June 12, 2018
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commissioners debated and then removed from the agenda a proposal to create a full‑time county events coordinator position; critics and some commissioners raised concerns about cost, overlap with existing staff, and whether contracting would be more economical.

The Utah County Board of Commissioners voted to strike a proposal to add a full‑time, career‑service county events coordinator after extended discussion about cost, role and recruitment.

Commissioner Graves, who led much of the questioning, noted the county previously contracted for event services at roughly $2,000 a month ($24,000 per year) and said the proposed in‑house position (with benefits) would cost “roughly $75,000,” a significant increase. Graves said an RFP, cost analysis or reassignment of duties should be considered before creating a new position.

Commissioner Lee and other commissioners raised concerns about scope overlap with existing departments and staff — including IT, departmental assistants and the commission office — and whether the job description and qualifications matched the level of financial oversight described in the draft. Staff said the role was intended to expand beyond the scope of the prior contractor and could be adjusted if the commission desired.

Public commenter Michelle Arujo criticized the proposal strongly, saying it was misplaced at a time when other priorities exist: “I think it's absolutely disgusting that this is even considered… you wanna hire a glorified party planner.” Commissioners heard the criticism and ultimately agreed to remove the item from the agenda to allow for further revision or alternative approaches.

Next step: The item was stricken 3–0; staff can either revise the proposal, pursue an RFP, or reassign event duties within existing county resources.