Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Facilities Ada Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners direct bids for annex front doors after ADA and security concerns
Summary
Court discussed non‑compliant swinging doors, maglock restrictions, drop‑ceiling constraints and cost estimates for openers vs. sliding doors; staff were directed to solicit multiple bids and return with recommendations at the next meeting.
Presiding officials and building staff told the court the annex front vestibule doors are not ADA compliant and have recurring security problems: existing swinging doors yield only about 27 inches of clear opening per leaf, gaps allow doors to be pulled open, and a drop ceiling above the vestibule will likely need modification for any automated opener installation.
A building contractor (speaker 11) explained that to meet ADA clearances and security needs either existing doors must be modified (including addressing gaps and locks) or replaced with sliding doors. Cost estimates discussed in the meeting included an earlier Guardian quote (~$18,000 for openers on existing doors) and sliding‑door replacement estimates around $40,000. Staff described practical constraints: both sets of doors may have to open simultaneously to meet the 32‑inch clear opening required by ADA, and maglocks have limited applicability on swinging doors.
The court voted to solicit multiple bids, have contractors evaluate options (repair/modify vs. sliding doors) and return recommendations at the next regular meeting date. Commissioners emphasized balancing accessibility for wheelchair users and secure lock‑down when the building is not staffed.
Next steps: staff will collect multiple written bids and present cost comparisons and recommendations to the court at or before the September meeting.
