Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners table decorum rule changes after debate over responding to public comments
Summary
Hood County commissioners discussed proposed edits to meeting rules that would clarify whether officials may respond to open-mic comments; County Attorney Mills said the code permits factual responses to true inquiries but not commentary, public participants urged the court to discuss items before public comment, and the court tabled the changes until Jan. 28.
The Hood County Commissioners Court began a review of proposed edits to its rules of procedure, conduct and decorum on Jan. 14 and tabled the item to allow staff to reconcile conflicting language and return a clean draft at the Jan. 28 meeting.
County Attorney Mills told the court the governing code allows a government body to provide factual information in response to a true inquiry but cautioned against turning open-mic comments into a back-and-forth discussion. "The code simply says that you can respond to inquiries," Mills said, adding that factual answers to true questions (for example, "Is there a burn ban?") are different from responses to commentary.
Public participant Miss Brown told the court she preferred that commissioners conduct their discussion before public comments so that speakers' concerns are not caught up in commissioners' internal debate. The court’s presiding officer proposed that the member who places an item on the agenda present an introductory statement before public comment; the court agreed to return with harmonized language and a cleaned-up draft online.
The court voted to table the proposed rules changes unanimously and placed the item on the Jan. 28 agenda for further action.
