Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Provider Payments topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Providers say prior-authorization and coding changes left legitimate programs unpaid; Access officials point to fraud response

Arizona Senate Health and Human Services Committee · October 1, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Providers including The Haven and trade groups told senators that October 2024 coding and prior-authorization changes, and delayed payments, forced closures and unpaid claims; Access officials said many claims are still paid (84% approval in prepayment review) while acknowledging timeliness and staffing problems and pledging more technical assistance and data.

Providers and provider groups testified that policy changes and prepayment-review processes implemented after the fraud revelations have disrupted cash flow for legitimate behavioral-health providers.

"Every day that funding is withheld from legitimate providers like the Haven, more people lose access to life-saving treatment," Amy Graves, CEO of The Haven in Tucson, told the committee, saying the organization is owed about $375,000 for AIHP services. Heather Dukes and Michelle Coldwell testified that delayed prior authorizations and months-long enrollment or contracting timelines threatened provider solvency, especially in rural areas.

Lynn Emmons, assistant deputy director for fee-for-service programs, said Access has added prior authorization for some intensive outpatient services and that prepayment-review claims have an approval rate of about 84%. She acknowledged lengthening turnaround times as volume increased following October 2024 coding and policy changes and outlined a ticketing system for provider technical assistance (initial response within ~3 hours; average resolution under 14 days for tickets).

Senators pressed for metrics and examples: how long claims take today versus 2020, the percentage of denials overturned on appeal, and a year-by-year breakdown of suspensions, terminations and recoupments. DFSM agreed to provide further data and to build a dashboard showing turnaround times, provider appeal outcomes and the list of providers on 100% prepayment review (382 added since Jan 2024 was cited).

Ending: Access committed to provide the committee with requested operational data, including denial-overturn metrics, timelines for prior-authorizations and an org chart of recent hires; the chair asked for deliverables within 30 days.