Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Orange County Board schedules extended work sessions, convenes closed session under FOIA
Summary
The board agreed to two extended work sessions (Oct. 6, 1–5 p.m., and Oct. 14, 2–5 p.m.) to advance district revisions and then approved a motion to enter closed session citing the Virginia Freedom of Information Act to discuss personnel, economic development, and legal matters; the board certified the closed session by roll call on return.
Board members agreed to schedule two extended work sessions to allow more time for substantive work on district revisions and related items that hour-long meetings do not accommodate. After discussion of availability and holiday conflicts, the board set the first session for Oct. 6 from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. and a second session for Oct. 14 from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m.
During the discussion several supervisors emphasized that hour-long agenda slots had hindered progress: one board member said the longer sessions would give more time to develop momentum and make preliminary decisions. No formal votes were required to set the work-session schedule; staff were directed to calendar the sessions.
Later in the meeting an unidentified board member moved "to enter closed session as permitted by the Virginia Freedom of Information Act" to discuss matters including personnel actions, a prospective business location or expansion (economic development), consultation on probable litigation regarding Wilderness Crossing, and legal advice concerning a potential housing project and employment-related claims. The motion referenced the Code of Virginia's closed-session provisions and was seconded; the board adjourned to closed session.
After reconvening in open session, the board conducted a roll call certification that only matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements had been discussed. Roll call responses recorded in the transcript included Mister Marshall, Miss Haile, Mister Nickel, Chairman Mark Johnson, and Mister Vanhoven each answering "Aye." The meeting then adjourned.
The closed-session citations as spoken during the motion reference the Virginia Freedom of Information Act and the statutory closed-session code sections as presented at the meeting. The board did not announce outcomes of personnel or legal discussions at the open meeting.
