Get email alerts on the Charter School Reviews topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Gateway Community Charters presents renewal petitions; board approves SAVA material revision
Summary
Gateway Community Charters presented renewal petitions for Higher Learning Academy and Futures High School and sought a material revision for Sacramento Academic and Vocational Academy (SAVA) to add sixth grade; the board approved the SAVA material revision and heard public support for HLA and Futures.
Representatives of Gateway Community Charters (GCC) presented renewal materials to the Twin Rivers Unified Board for three schools. Superintendent Jason Sample introduced the Higher Learning Academy (HLA) renewal petition and described HLA as serving about 520 students, with 87 percent eligible for free or reduced-price lunch and a diverse demographic mix; he noted the school's IB primary-years authorization and cited local assessment gains (for example, an increase in reading proficiency from 14% to 29% reported in his presentation).
Gateway also presented renewal materials for Futures High School (serving about 470 students) and described academic programs including Project Lead The Way, a new biomedical pathway, and expanding dual-enrollment opportunities. A Futures graduating senior presented testimony about the school's impact.
On the Sacramento Academic and Vocational Academy (SAVA), GCC requested a material revision to add sixth grade so the middle-school configuration would be 6-8. Trustee Baker moved to approve the material revision, Trustee Bastian seconded, and the clerk recorded the motion as carried.
Members of the public spoke in favor of HLA and Futures during the public hearings. The board indicated support for the presentations and approved the SAVA material revision on the record; GCC asked that HLA and Futures be considered for five-year renewal terms based on outcomes presented in the packet.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
