Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Developer presents massing, parking and workforce-housing plan for large mixed‑use site
Summary
A developer presented massing, circulation, parking and workforce-housing calculations for a mixed‑use project, emphasizing building‑height choices will determine unit counts, parking demand and workforce-housing obligations; commissioners asked for a site visit and more detailed volumetric analysis.
An applicant team presented plans for a large mixed‑use development, saying building heights are the key determinant of unit counts, parking demand and the workforce-housing requirement.
The presenter told the Snyderville Basin Planning Commission that the team has been refining parking, transit access and workforce-housing calculations with county staff and outside advisers, and emphasized they do not intend the market units to be used for nightly rentals. "We are not interested in this development in a nightly rental type of scenario for any of the market units," the presenter said when describing tenant expectations and lease length.
Why it matters: The project sits in a split entitlement area where the underlying community‑commercial zone carries a 20% workforce‑housing obligation while the new mixed‑use (NMU) overlay carries 50%. The presenter said most housing is concentrated in the NMU area, so the ultimate height and entitlement choices will materially change how many affordable units the developer must provide.
Key details: The team described an east–west pedestrian corridor through the site, pedestrian tunnels near a planned roundabout to tie the development into county trails, two internal transit stops and provisions for a grocery-anchored retail configuration. To mitigate on‑site surface parking visibility, the plan concentrates parking behind retail frontages and adds a valet‑style system behind restaurant buildings; that valet approach is expected to reclaim roughly 50 stalls.
Commissioner reaction: Commissioners praised measures such as covered residential parking and internal transit stops but pushed for more precise 3‑D modeling and a site visit to assess how proposed taller buildings will read from the roundabout and nearby neighborhoods. One commissioner recommended exploring permeable pavers to reduce stormwater runoff and heat island effects; another asked staff and the developer to test a "peak‑hour parking plan" that distinguishes resident and customer demand.
Next steps: Commissioners requested additional volumetric exhibits, a focused parking study tied to finalized building heights, and a site visit. Several commissioners said they are open to the developer pursuing the maximum code heights if the result substantially increases the workforce‑housing yield, provided the team can demonstrate acceptable circulation, buffering and visual mitigation.
