Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Tax Exemption topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council grants property‑tax exemption to Ivory Innovations for affordable housing; assessor warns case may go to state tax commission
Summary
After debate over whether infrastructure work counts as 'construction commenced' under state practice, the Board of Equalization approved a 501(c)(3) property‑tax exemption for Ivory Innovations' affordable‑housing project; county assessor said she would review and consider an appeal to the state tax commission if necessary.
The Board of Equalization considered and approved an application from Ivory Innovations, a 501(c)(3) developer, seeking a property‑tax exemption for an affordable‑housing project. Applicant representatives presented documentation including IRS safe‑harbor guidance for charitable low‑income housing, HUD area‑median‑income tables, a rent roll approach, and a schedule showing approximately $200,000 in infrastructure and entitlement costs to date (roads, water/sewer laterals and utility stubs).
The county assessor recommended denying exemptions for vacant lots until a building permit for the structure is issued, citing a prior state tax‑commission decision (Mountainlands) that required a building permit by Jan. 1 for exemption eligibility. Applicants argued that recorded plats, installed primary infrastructure with laterals stubbed to unit pads and an irrevocable commitment to build justified the exemption.
Council members split on legal interpretation but several emphasized local policy support for affordable housing. The board moved to approve the exemption application; staff noted the decision could be appealed to the state tax commission for clarification on whether off‑site or subdivision infrastructure meets the 'construction commenced' standard. The county’s assessor said her office would review the decision and consider an appeal if the board was inclined to grant the exemption.
The council’s vote to grant the exemption was recorded by voice/roll and passed; staff and the applicant said either side could appeal to the state tax commission for a definitive ruling.
