Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Appland Plan Amendment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board agrees to study Appland Properties plan amendment but keep rezoning separate
Summary
Staff and applicants presented a request to change ~96.8 acres west of Apple Valley from business to residential and to include it in the Urban Development Area; the board consented to further study but favored separating comprehensive plan amendment review from any rezoning unless concurrent processing is justified.
Frederick County supervisors and the Planning Commission agreed to advance further study of the Appland Properties comprehensive plan amendment but to keep the comprehensive plan amendment and any rezoning steps separate unless site readiness and applicant materials justify concurrent processing.
Staff described the request as four parcels totaling about 96.8 acres west of Apple Valley and inside the sewer and water service area. The applicant seeks a future land‑use designation of residential and inclusion in the county’s Urban Development Area, which would allow denser residential rezonings. Staff recommended further study and noted floodplain and infrastructure issues that would need review.
“Given some of the lessons we’ve learned over the years, there may be benefit to doing it concurrently with a rezoning application to vet all the potential impacts,” staff said, while adding that concurrent processing can shorten timeframes for the Planning Commission and impose statutory review deadlines.
Supervisors and planning commissioners expressed mixed views. Several supported further study but emphasized the need for water, fire‑service, and transportation analyses. One supervisor asked for a fire chief’s report and a study from Frederick Water on water supply and treatment capacity before moving toward rezoning.
The board’s consensus was to direct staff to study the Appland application further and to request specific service provider reports; the board did not approve any land‑use or zoning change at this meeting. Staff said they will bring additional information, including infrastructure assessments and any recommended process for concurrent rezoning, back to the board for future hearings.
