Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Family Rules Special Findings Declarations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Panel outlines family‑court rule changes: special findings for juveniles, waiver of service and broader declaration rule
Summary
The committee reviewed multiple family‑court rule changes: updated competency language for juvenile delinquency, amendments to allow waiver of service and immediate hearings for special‑immigration findings in parentage/divorce cases, and a streamlined declaration rule to permit sworn declarations in lieu of affidavits. Members raised procedural, fairness and coordination questions; items remain in comment period.
The Joint Judicial Rules Committee considered several related family‑court proposals that reporters said are intended to implement statutory changes and to modernize procedure.
Amy Davenport, reporter for the Family Rules Committee, described three linked items. First, an update to juvenile delinquency competency language replaces outdated terms (for example, "mental retardation") with contemporary, respectful language such as "psychiatric disability," "mental health condition," "developmental disability," and "intellectual disability." Committee members welcomed the change.
Second, Davenport explained amendments to Rule 4.1 and Rule 4.3 to implement a statutory pathway for special immigration findings for juveniles (a pathway that can lead to special immigration status when a child has been abandoned, abused, or neglected and the court finds reunification is not viable). In divorce and parentage cases the proposed rules would: permit a motion to waive service when diligent efforts to locate a parent fail; require the motion to list parents' names/locations or explain efforts to identify them; allow the petition for special findings to be set immediately for hearing with the case‑manager conference postponed until after those findings; and require the court to issue written findings when granting waiver.
Third, the committee discussed a broader declaration rule that would let parties file statements "signed under penalty of perjury" in place of sworn affidavits in most court filings. The reporter said the rule is intended to simplify practice post‑pandemic; the rule would still require declarations to be based on personal knowledge where needed (for example, on summary‑judgment-related factual statements).
Committee members asked questions about safeguards for waiver of service (noting waiver is "a big deal" because it allows a case to proceed without the absent parent's participation), the evidentiary threshold for abandonment, and coordination with probate rules. Senator Tanya Bechovsky asked whether upheaval in a parent's home country could be mistaken for abandonment; Davenport said the court must make the specific special findings and consider offered evidence.
All items discussed are in the public comment period; reporters will circulate final draft language and the Judicial Rules Committee may register comments or objections in writing.
