Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Transportation Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

County hears pilot results from Smart North Florida using computer-vision traffic sensors on Wells Road

Clay County Board of County Commissioners · September 26, 2023
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A Smart North Florida presentation showed Streetscope dash‑cam and Street Simplified intersection camera pilots along Wells Road, identifying six hot spots and high counts of red‑light running, left‑turn conflicts and pedestrian interactions; presenters emphasized no collection of personally identifiable information and recommended targeted low‑cost mitigations.

Clayton Levins of Smart North Florida presented the findings of a two‑tool traffic‑safety pilot along the Wells Road corridor to the Clay County Board of County Commissioners on Sept. 26, 2023. The nonprofit used two systems — Streetscope (an egocentric, dash‑cam computer‑vision approach) and Street Simplified (pole‑mounted intersection cameras) — to collect visual data, run proprietary algorithms and produce a risk score and recommended mitigations for problem segments.

The 15‑minute briefing, which covered roughly 2,000,000 data points gathered during multiple runs, identified six hot spots along Wells Road. Levins said the systems detected frequent hazards including left‑turn conflicts, red‑light running, speeding, merging conflicts and interactions with vulnerable road users such as pedestrians and bicyclists. At Deberry Avenue, the pilot recorded dozens of red‑light events in a 24‑hour period; Levins said some nearby intersections recorded up to about 90 such events in one day.

"No solutions that we deploy ... collect, store, or transmit personally identifiable information," Levins said, stressing the pilot used computer vision only to classify vehicle, pedestrian and bicycle interactions and to calculate a hazard index. He described the Streetscope output as an "egocentric" driver view that flags risk in real time and the Street Simplified reports as 24‑hour intersection audits that can be turned around in days.

Commissioners asked about counts, costs and next steps. Levins said Streetscope required more setup and a longer turnaround than Street Simplified but offered driver‑level insights, while Street Simplified could be deployed quickly and scored at approximately $5,000 per intersection as a scalable option. He also noted opportunities to coordinate with FDOT for state roadways (Blanding Boulevard and others) to align mitigation and grant efforts.

The presentation concluded with a brief question and answer period; commissioners requested follow‑up detail on specific counts and recommended a staff review to consider low‑cost fixes such as restriping, lighting upgrades and changes to left‑turn phasing where the data indicates visibility or geometry issues.

The board did not take formal action on the presentation itself; staff said they would circulate the full reports to commissioners and provide more detailed follow‑ups on suggested pilot deployments and FDOT coordination.