Assembly members debate MAPS project list, priorities and whether to cap projects
Members discussed which municipal projects should be funded by a MAPS allocation, the trade-offs of limiting the ballot to seven projects, and whether to dedicate part of revenue to a housing trust.
The full story
Committee members reviewed candidate MAPS projects and debated whether the first ballot should present a limited, deliverable list to voters. Sponsors proposed up to seven projects — four public facilities (public health clinic, libraries, recreation centers, animal control) and three community or private projects — and said a cap makes a clear, sellable package for voters.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
or