Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the It Spending topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County Officials Consider Centralizing IT as Public Works Seeks Annual Work‑order Software Fee
Summary
Public Works proposed a recurring line for annual maintenance of TMA work‑order software and commissioners discussed centralizing IT licensing to gain enterprise discounts and reduce duplicate purchases across departments.
Public Works asked the court to add a recurring line-item to cover annual maintenance for the TMA work‑order software used to manage building maintenance tasks, noting the expense keeps the county on a support and upgrade contract.
Staff described the maintenance fee as a recurring annual cost and requested it be recorded under 5311 in the mechanical maintenance budget. The packet contains slightly different figures in places; staff summarized the requested annual maintenance amount as roughly $6,200 to $6,210 in the materials provided but also referenced a $5,910 figure in oral remarks. Commissioners urged caution about duplicative purchases across departments and recommended exploring countywide enterprise licensing for commonly used software to reduce per‑license costs.
One county official described the software maintenance as “the cost of doing business” for keeping work orders, updates and tier‑one technical support available. Commissioners and staff discussed whether those charges should remain in a department‑level budget (1500) or be consolidated into a centralized IT budget to pursue enterprise agreements and save money across multiple departmental licenses.
No formal allocation decision was made. Staff said they will consider commissioners’ suggestion to evaluate enterprise licensing across departments and return with a recommended funding location for TMA maintenance.
