Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infill Regulations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board tables infill-development amendment after extended debate over definitions and impact
Summary
A proposal to amend subdivision regulations for infill development was untabled for discussion but ultimately tabled again so staff and aldermen can refine language about parcel definitions, average-density calculations and potential 'land-locking' effects.
Aldermen reopened consideration of bill 5252, an ordinance amending subdivision regulations to govern infill development, and held extended discussion before tabling the measure for further work.
The board discussed newly circulated language meant to define "infill" and provide a calculation that would limit a proposed subdivision to no more than 125% of the average density of adjacent parcels. Proponents said the language implements a comprehensive-plan goal to avoid dramatically higher density than surrounding areas; critics warned that the proposal could "land-lock" some small city-owned parcels and restrict development in parts of town.
Questions focused on what counts as an adjacent parcel (tax ID map parcels were proposed), how acreage on large parcels would be counted for averaging, whether the change applies only to subdivisions rather than single-lot residential development, and whether consultant feedback (from Butler and Associates) had been fully incorporated. Several aldermen recommended additional drafting and suggested the measure be read in full if acted on; Alderman Meadows moved to table the bill for further work and the motion carried.
The board did not adopt the revised language at this meeting; staff and interested aldermen will continue drafting and vetting the language before it returns for further readings.
