Audit of draft articles vs. transcript (categories with issues)

Spelling: []

Clarity: []

Chronology: []

Framing: []

Misinformation: [{"type":"numeric_transcription_error","description":"General Fund line in transcript reads '$200,000,718,023.62' while grand total reads '$3,126,969.14', an apparent transcription or typographical error; article flagged and paraphrased but requires verification with official records.","severity":"high"}]

Misidentification: [{"type":"unnamed_speakers_attribution","description":"Several board responses are attributed to 'a board member' because the transcript does not provide full names for speakers who gave extended explanations; the article avoids attributing direct quotes to unnamed individuals but paraphrases their remarks. Consider verifying speaker names in official minutes if attribution is needed.","severity":"medium"}]

Out_of_context: []

Quantitative precision: [{"type":"reserve_and_participation_numbers","description":"Public commenter cited approx. '5 and a half million' in reserves and participation rates (~35%); these are treated as the speaker's assertions and marked approximate; verification recommended.","severity":"medium"}]

Process clarity: [{"type":"vote_reporting_format","description":"Motion for student placement recorded as voice vote 'Passes 9 0' with mover 'Clafel'; minutes do not provide a roll-call listing of all members' votes. Article records outcome as 9–0 but notes voice vote format.","severity":"low"}]

Context clarity: []

Question emphasis: []

Omission: [{"type":"executive_content_missing_number","description":"Contract addendum executive content had a missing numeric weeks value referenced by a board member; transcript flags it but no correction text included—staff agreed to review. Article notes the omission and staff's plan to correct.","severity":"low"}]

Bias: []

Duplicate: []