Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks Master Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Consultants present Troy parks master plan draft emphasizing maintenance, accessibility and prioritized projects
Summary
Consultants from American StructurePoint and Legacy Sports told city leaders that strong public engagement (882 survey responses) supports a five‑year maintenance package (~$2.2M), accessibility upgrades, and targeted investments such as a Duke Park redesign and modest new recreation amenities.
Consultants from American StructurePoint and Legacy Sports presented a draft parks and recreation master plan at a May work session in Troy, urging the city to prioritize system‑wide maintenance, accessibility improvements and a phased approach to larger projects.
Matthew Rourke, planning and economic development group leader with American StructurePoint, said the plan is an early draft intended to guide investment decisions and strengthen grant applications. “882 responses came in,” Rourke said, citing the online survey as evidence of broad public engagement that shaped recommendations.
Why it matters: the plan aims to balance upkeep of a sprawling local system with upgrades and new facilities while aligning priorities to competitive grant programs such as those administered by the Ohio Department of Natural Resources and the statewide SCORP process. The consultants compared Troy to similar jurisdictions using National Recreation and Park Association metrics and concluded Troy has about 11.2 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents and 17.7 miles of trails, but noted many trails lack inter‑park connectivity.
Key recommendations: consultants proposed a two‑track approach. First, a package of system‑wide maintenance and smaller accessibility investments — described as roughly $2,200,000 in anticipated maintenance needs over five years — to preserve existing assets. Second, a menu of facility and program options (from low‑cost additions such as a nine‑hole disc golf course to larger projects such as an expanded Duke Park) that the city could phase in as funding, staffing and community priorities align. Rourke also recommended an ADA line item in capital planning to address legacy accessibility gaps as parks are rehabilitated.
Staffing and budget context: the consultants highlighted that Troy’s combined parks and recreation full‑time staffing (about 13 FTEs) is lower than in many comparable communities, a constraint that should inform decisions to add facilities or shift operational models.
Public reaction and next steps: during the open comment period, users and local sports organizers largely supported improvements, especially at Duke Park, but residents also pressed for thoughtful skatepark planning and safer trail connectivity for teens. Rourke and staff said the draft will be posted on the city website for broader review and that recommendations will be refined before final adoption. The work session ended without votes on specific projects.
