Lawmakers press regulators on implementing the Genius Act and the impact of stablecoins on community banks
Loading...
Summary
Congress pressed regulators about the Genius Act rule‑writing timetable, deposit flight risks from interest‑bearing stablecoins, and how stablecoin reserves should be defined and protected by regulation.
Members pressed regulators on the implementation timeline and supervisory approach for payment stablecoins under the Genius Act, focusing on near‑term deadlines and potential deposit disintermediation.
Rep. Lynch and others asked whether traditional banks should be allowed to engage with digital assets. Vice Chair Bowman clarified the Fed’s view: ‘‘We are working to provide clarity on digital assets ... as required by the Genius Act,’’ and added the Fed’s work focuses on stablecoin issuer regulation and guardrails to allow banks to participate if congress has provided authority.
Several members highlighted estimates that interest‑bearing stablecoins could cause large deposit outflows from the banking system. Committee members requested regulators evaluate the systemic outlook and consider whether new statutory or supervisory tools are needed to prevent destabilizing runs on community banks.
On reserves, members asked whether commodities should qualify as eligible backing for payment stablecoins. Acting FDIC Chair said the Genius Act is prescriptive about eligible reserves (deposits, Treasuries, demand instruments) and suggested commodity backing would be an alternate model requiring additional mitigants.
NCUA and OCC witnesses said they will engage with credit unions and banks to prepare for the regulatory pathway, and the NCUA chair said the agency expects to meet statutory deadlines for proposed rules and will work with interagency counterparts.
What's next: Regulators committed to producing proposed rules (issuance, how to be an issuer) in the timeline set by the statute and to provide written follow‑up on deposit‑flight modeling and reserve treatment.
