Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Multilingual Programming topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Tomball ISD outlines multilingual progress, proposes feeder changes amid capacity concerns
Summary
District leaders reported growth in emergent bilingual services, TELPAS gains and a 13% reclassification rate; they proposed a cost-neutral red-feeder one-way dual-language option for 2026-27 to address capacity at Rose Hill while trustees asked for an in-depth workshop on 1-way vs. 2-way tradeoffs.
At the Oct. 13 workshop, Chief Academic Officer Doctor Michael Webb presented the district—s annual multilingual report and a proposal for expanding dual-language programming.
Webb said Tomball ISD serves emergent bilingual students through multiple delivery methods and that the district—s top five languages are Spanish, Vietnamese, Mandarin, Arabic and Portuguese (75 languages in total). Current counts in the presentation were roughly 1,100 students in bilingual programs, about 2,260 in ESL programs, and 57 in alternative-language placements. Webb reported progress on English proficiency: 30% of EB students gained at least one proficiency level on TELPAS in the most recent year (up from 21% in 2023), and roughly 13% of EB students met state reclassification criteria and exited EB identification this year.
Reviewing two-way dual-language outcomes, Webb said seven-year cohorts that began in kindergarten show stronger performance in math and science for students in two-way programs (including monitored and non-EB reclassified students). Because Rose Hill Elementary—s enrollment is approaching capacity (about 772 students of a reported 866 capacity), Webb proposed creating a "red" feeder pattern with a one-way dual-language program in 2026-27 to relieve pressure at Rose Hill and to create a cost-neutral expansion that could later convert to two-way programming if demographics allow. "We are in need of a red feeder pattern to serve students that are emergent bilingual," Webb said.
Trustees asked for more analysis and a formal pros-and-cons comparison of one-way versus two-way dual-language implementation, staffing and certification implications, and the timing for student reclassification (TELPAS advanced-high composite plus STAAR/STAR performance and teacher recommendation). Several board members requested a deeper workshop to review seven-year cohort outcomes, historical goals from program inception and capacity/siting scenarios before committing to a feeder change.
District leaders committed to returning with a fall demographic report and recommended materials so trustees could evaluate program design choices and potential campus capacity adjustments.
