Get email alerts on the Developmental Disabilities Legislative Priorities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council backs developmental disabilities advisory board priorities with edits on restraint language
Summary
Councilors generally supported the Developmental Disabilities Advisory Board's 2026 priorities — protecting Medicaid, addressing provider rates, boosting accessible affordable housing, and improving services for aging adults — and asked staff to substitute 'training/guidance' language for 'abolish' regarding restraint and seclusion in schools.
Get email alerts on the Developmental Disabilities Legislative Priorities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Clark County staff and advisory-board representatives briefed the council on legislative priorities proposed by the Developmental Disabilities Advisory Board for the 2026 session. Jordan Bogie summarized the priorities and noted the board's request that the council adopt them to give lobbyists guidance during the session.
Key priorities outlined were: protecting Medicaid and existing funding streams that support services for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities; supporting provider-rate updates to reflect actual costs; safeguarding early-childhood interventions and special-education services under IDEA; increasing funding for accessible, inclusive affordable housing; reducing use of restraint, seclusion, and isolation in schools through training and alternative strategies; and developing aging-adult services tailored for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
Councilors supported the package in general but asked staff to soften the phrasing on restraint/seclusion (change 'abolish' to focus on training, guidance, and reducing use where appropriate) and to add the word 'accessible' to the housing priority. Staff said it would work with lobbyists to track relevant bills and return specific items to council during weekly legislative updates when needed.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

