Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board agrees evaluation rubric and cadence for superintendent review
Summary
Trustees discussed and agreed to circulate an evaluation rubric for the superintendent, set deadlines for check‑in feedback and to synthesize responses in closed session before providing a public summary. The board also discussed adding measurable goals aligned to the strategic plan for future evaluations.
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The board spent its final agenda period reviewing an evaluation rubric for Superintendent Michael (interim) and discussing how the evaluation process will proceed.
Trustees debated two rubric formats and whether to solicit cabinet/staff input as part of check‑ins. Members agreed to distribute the chosen rubric to trustees and to collect responses by mid‑December; the board will synthesize the feedback, meet in closed session to finalize the evaluation and then provide a public summary at a subsequent meeting. Several trustees urged that future evaluations align specific measurable goals to the district strategic plan so expectations are clear and accountability is tied to discrete benchmarks.
The board also discussed cadence for check‑ins (two interim check‑ins and a final evaluation at the end of the school year) and agreed to use one consolidated rubric for the coming cycle, with staff input provided to the board only for final synthesis. No personnel action was taken; the board adopted a process and timeline for completing the review.

